1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2002 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota RAV4 (145 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 609 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2002 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | Daffodil | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 57 L |