1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 Toyota Will
To start off, 2002 Toyota Will is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Will is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Will (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Will should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Will weights approximately 324 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Will, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2002 Toyota Will | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | Daffodil | Will |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 45 L |