1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2003 Ford Escape
To start off, 2003 Ford Escape is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Escape (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Escape weights approximately 810 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2003 Ford Escape | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Escape |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 59 L |