1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Daewoo Lacetti
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Lacetti is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Lacetti is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Lacetti (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Lacetti should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Lacetti weights approximately 369 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Lacetti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Daewoo Lacetti | |
| Make | DAF | Daewoo |
| Model | Daffodil | Lacetti |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |
