1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Kia Optima
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Optima weights approximately 822 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Kia Optima | |
Make | DAF | Kia |
Model | Daffodil | Optima |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 65 L |