1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2004 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1926 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Lincoln Navigator | |
| Make | DAF | Lincoln |
| Model | Daffodil | Navigator |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5406 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 106 L |
