1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 44 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Daffodil | Minica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2350 mm |
