1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 521 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 584 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | DAF | Pagani |
Model | Daffodil | Zonda |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 547 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |