1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Passat (270 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Passat should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 1179 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volkswagen Passat is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Passat will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Volkswagen Passat | |
| Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
| Model | Daffodil | Passat |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 80 L |
