1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 879 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | DAF | Jeep |
| Model | Daffodil | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 190 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 72 L |
