1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1810 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | Daffodil | Armada |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 106 L |
