1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2005 Nissan Cima is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Cima weights approximately 1104 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Nissan Cima | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | Daffodil | Cima |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |