1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (113 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 509 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | DAF | Renault |
Model | Daffodil | Megane |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1175 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |