1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,477 cc, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (221 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 1614 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | Daffodil | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4477 cc |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2280 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 141 L |
