1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | Daffodil | Charger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 72 L |