1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2006 Nissan M | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | Daffodil | M |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
