1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2007 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2007 Toyota Highlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,311 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Highlander (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 674 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2007 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | Daffodil | Highlander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3311 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 72 L |