1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2007 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | Daffodil | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 100 L |
