1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2008 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Mustang weights approximately 444 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | Daffodil | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 61 L |
