1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1312 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | DAF | Jeep |
Model | Daffodil | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1978 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |