1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2051 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | DAF | Land Rover |
| Model | Daffodil | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3628 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2717 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 105 L |
