1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 514 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | Daffodil | 5 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |
