1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | DAF | Holden |
| Model | Daffodil | UTE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
