1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2009 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,768 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Cherokee (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1389 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | DAF | Jeep |
| Model | Daffodil | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2768 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |
