1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 459 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | Daffodil | 6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2488 cc |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 64 L |