1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | DAF | Citroen |
| Model | Daffodil | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 154 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
