1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1860 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Ford Expedition | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Expedition |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2526 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 106 L |