1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2010 Ford Explorer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Explorer (207 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Explorer weights approximately 306 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Ford Explorer | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Explorer |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 85 L |