1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 2139 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | F-250 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 115 L |