1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1049 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | DAF | Jeep |
| Model | Daffodil | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 205 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4138 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |
