1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (311 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1528 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | DAF | Volvo |
Model | Daffodil | XC90 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 80 L |