1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 499 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | DAF | Audi |
| Model | Daffodil | R8 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 525 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 90 L |
