1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 309 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | DAF | Audi |
| Model | Daffodil | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 335 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
