1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche weights approximately 1534 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | DAF | Chevrolet |
Model | Daffodil | Avalanche |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 117 L |