1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2011 GMC Sierra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 GMC Sierra (353 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1993 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DAF Daffodil | 2011 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | DAF | GMC |
| Model | Daffodil | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 353 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2659 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2440 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 129 L |
