1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2012 Aston Martin Rapide
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 Aston Martin Rapide is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Aston Martin Rapide (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 444 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Rapide should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Aston Martin Rapide weights approximately 1324 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2012 Aston Martin Rapide | |
Make | DAF | Aston Martin |
Model | Daffodil | Rapide |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5019 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 90 L |