1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2012 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler Voyager (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 1444 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2012 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | DAF | Chrysler |
Model | Daffodil | Voyager |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5151 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1999 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 76 L |