1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2013 Audi A7
To start off, 2013 Audi A7 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Audi A7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A7 (306 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A7 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A7 weights approximately 1244 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Audi A7 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Audi A7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2013 Audi A7 | |
Make | DAF | Audi |
Model | Daffodil | A7 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | single |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4969 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2139 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2914 mm |