1966 DAF Daffodil vs. 2013 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 2013 Ford Fiesta is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Fiesta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Fiesta (118 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fiesta should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Fiesta weights approximately 506 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DAF Daffodil | 2013 Ford Fiesta | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Fiesta |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1172 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1976 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 45 L |