1966 Datsun 1000 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Datsun 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Datsun 1000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1966 Datsun 1000. (61 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1966 Datsun 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 566 kg more than 1966 Datsun 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Datsun 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Datsun 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Datsun 1000. (84 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Datsun 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Datsun 1000 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Datsun | Dodge |
| Model | 1000 | Neon |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 988 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 87.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 59 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2670 mm |
