1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 1966 DKW F 102 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,175 cc (3 cylinders), 1966 DKW F 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 DKW F 102 (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 DKW Munga weights approximately 200 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
| Make | DKW | DKW |
| Model | F 102 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 31 L |
