1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1969 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 255 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 102 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 4731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 41 L |