1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 1982 Renault 11 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Renault 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW F 102 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1982 Renault 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 DKW F 102 (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 11. (100 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 DKW F 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 1982 Renault 11 | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | F 102 | 11 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 34 L |
