1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1986 Lotus Excel
To start off, 1986 Lotus Excel is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Lotus Excel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lotus Excel (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lotus Excel should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Lotus Excel weights approximately 267 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Lotus Excel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Lotus Excel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Lotus Excel (224 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1986 Lotus Excel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102. 1986 Lotus Excel has automatic transmission and 1966 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1966 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Lotus Excel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 1986 Lotus Excel | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | F 102 | Excel |
Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1177 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 31 L |