1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1995 Ford Scorpio
To start off, 1995 Ford Scorpio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Scorpio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Scorpio (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Scorpio should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Scorpio weights approximately 320 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Ford Scorpio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Scorpio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Scorpio (172 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Scorpio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 1995 Ford Scorpio | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 102 | Scorpio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
