1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | DKW | Mahindra |
| Model | F 102 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4310 mm |
