1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1999 Ford Ka
To start off, 1999 Ford Ka is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW F 102 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1999 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 1999 Ford Ka | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 102 | Ka |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |