1966 DKW F 102 vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (249 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 800 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln LS (361 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102. 1999 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 1966 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1966 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | DKW | Lincoln |
| Model | F 102 | LS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3934 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 249 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 361 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2910 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |
