1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 710 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
Model | F 102 | Colt |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 2972 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 95 L |