1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 810 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | F 102 | Megane |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1720 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |